Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/86461
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaulden, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, C.-
dc.contributor.authorKarnon, J.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPharmacoEconomics, 2014; 32(4):315-318-
dc.identifier.issn1170-7690-
dc.identifier.issn1179-2027-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/86461-
dc.description.abstractThe authors reflect on the article by S. Eckermann and B. Pekarsky which challenges several concepts including the methods of determining cost-effectiveness threshold for assessing the potential health technology in public healthcare system. They discuss the National Institute forHealth and Care Excellence (NICE) in Great Britain, the quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and disinvestment.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMike Paulden, Christopher McCabe, Jonathan Karnon-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0146-x-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectBiomedical Technology-
dc.subjectReimbursement Mechanisms-
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care-
dc.titleAchieving allocative efficiency in healthcare: nice in theory, not so NICE in practice?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40273-014-0146-x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidKarnon, J. [0000-0003-3220-2099]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.