Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87141
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVokes, R.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Anthropology, 2013; 21(4):523-541-
dc.identifier.issn0964-0282-
dc.identifier.issn1469-8676-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87141-
dc.descriptionArticle first published online: 20 NOV 2013-
dc.description.abstractAnthropological theory has always shown a particular fascination for the subject of the house. However, Latour's work offers a significant challenge for previous theorising in this area. Latour challenges the very idea of what a house is, and encourages us to see ‘the house’ as not a coherent form at all, so much as a multitude of (more or less stable) assemblages. He also forces us to re-examine the relationship between constructed dwellings and the social, encouraging us to see the former as having particular forms of agency within the latter. This article examines these ideas in relation to the ethnography of one particular house in rural south-western Uganda.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRichard Vokes-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rights© 2013 European Association of Social Anthropologists-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12047-
dc.subjectBruno Latour; actor-network theory; anthropology of the house; Uganda; sanitation-
dc.titleThe house unbuilt: actor-networks, social agency and the ethnography of a residence in south-western Uganda-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1469-8676.12047-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Anthropology & Development Studies publications
Aurora harvest 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_87141.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access289.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.