Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Medical Journal of Australia, 2012; 197(2):100-105||en|
|dc.description.abstract||OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of health care encounters at which a sample of adult Australians received appropriate care (ie, care in line with evidence-based or consensus-based guidelines). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Computer-assisted telephone interviews and retrospective review of the medical records (for 2009-2010) of a sample of at least 1000 Australian adults to measure compliance with 522 expert consensus indicators representing appropriate care for 22 common conditions. Participants were selected from households in areas of South Australia and New South Wales chosen to be representative of the socioeconomic profile of Australians. Health care encounters occurred in health care practices and hospitals with general practitioners, specialists, physiotherapists, chiropractors, psychologists and counsellors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of health care encounters at which the sample received appropriate care. RESULTS: From 15 292 households contacted by telephone, 7649 individuals agreed to participate, 3567 consented, 2638 proved eligible, and 1154 were included after gaining the consent of their health care providers. The adult Australians in this sample received appropriate care at 57% (95% CI, 54%-60%) of 35 573 eligible health care encounters. Compliance with indicators of appropriate care at condition level ranged from 13% (95% CI, 1%-43%) for alcohol dependence to 90% (95% CI, 85%-93%) for coronary artery disease. For health care providers with more than 300 eligible encounters each, overall compliance ranged from 32% to 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were pockets of excellence and some aspects of care were well managed across health care providers, the consistent delivery of appropriate care needs improvement, and gaps in care should be addressed. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards and better structuring of medical records to facilitate the delivery of more appropriate care.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||William B Runciman, Tamara D Hunt, Natalie A Hannaford, Peter D Hibbert, Johanna I Westbrook, Enrico W Coiera, Richard O Day, Diane M Hindmarsh, Jeffrey Braithwaite||en|
|dc.publisher||MJA Group Australia||en|
|dc.rights||Copyright status unknown||en|
|dc.subject||Humans; Medical Records; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Delivery of Health Care; Guideline Adherence; Quality Indicators, Health Care; New South Wales; South Australia; Female; Male; Interviews as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic||en|
|dc.title||CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia||en|
|pubs.library.collection||Translational Health Science publications||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Translational Health Science publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.