Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Assimilating evidence quality at a glance using graphic display: research synthesis on labor induction|
von Dadelszen, P.
|Citation:||Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012; 91(8):885-892|
|Caroline E. Fox, Seema A. Tirlapur, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, João Paulo Souza, Khalid S. Khan with the EBM-CONNECT Collaboration|
|Abstract:||Evidence profiled in the World Health Organization induction of labor guideline extended to 84 tables and 116 pages, which is hard to assimilate. Summarizing this evidence graphically can present information on key outcomes succinctly, illustrating where the gaps, strengths and weaknesses lie. For induction of labor, graphic representation clearly showed that evidence was lacking on maternal complications when comparing oxytocin with other agents, evidence was strong on birth within 24 h when comparing vaginal prostaglandins with placebo or no treatment, but again it was weak on uterine hyperstimulation when comparing oxytocin with vaginal prostaglandins. These graphs/plots allow readers to capture the essence of the information gathered at a glance. The use of graphical displays when interpreting and publishing data on several comparisons and outcomes is encouraged.|
|Keywords:||Induction of labor; guidelines; GRADE; GRADE plots; radar charts|
|Description:||B.W. Mol is a member of EBM-CONNECT Collaboration|
|Rights:||© 2012 The Authors|
|Appears in Collections:||Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.