Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/91754
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) for selecting at-risk patients for spirometry: a cross-sectional study in Australian general practice |
Author: | Stanley, A. Hasan, I. Crockett, A. Van Schayck, O. Zwar, N. |
Citation: | npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 2014; 24(1):14024-1-14024-5 |
Publisher: | Macmillan publishers |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
ISSN: | 2055-1010 2055-1010 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Anthony J Stanley, Iqbal Hasan, Alan J Crockett, Onno C P van Schayck & Nicholas A Zwar |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Using the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a selection tool for spirometry could potentially improve the efficiency and accuracy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis in at-risk patients. AIM: To identify an optimal single cut point for the CDQ that divides primary care patients into low or high likelihood of COPD, with the latter group undergoing spirometry. METHODS: Former or current smokers aged 40-85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse at various general practices in Sydney, Australia. The CDQ was collected and pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases with complete CDQ data and spirometry meeting quality standards were analysed (1,054 out of 1,631 patients). CDQ cut points were selected from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was 0.713. A cut point of 19.5 had the optimal combination of sensitivity (63%) and specificity (70%) with two-thirds below this cut point. A cut point of 14.5 corresponded to a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 35% and negative predictive value of 96%, and 31% of patients below this cut point. CONCLUSIONS: The CDQ can be used to select patients at risk of COPD for spirometry using one cut point. We consider two possible cut points. The 19.5 cut point excludes a higher proportion of patients from undergoing spirometry with the trade-off of more false negatives. The 14.5 cut point has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, includes more potential COPD cases but has a higher rate of false positives. |
Keywords: | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Questionnaires Sensitivity and Specificity Aged, 80 and over Middle Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Risk Factors Spirometry |
Rights: | © 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. to view a copy of this license, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
DOI: | 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.24 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/630421 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Public Health publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_91754.pdf | Published version | 397.61 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.