Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/9653
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVisvanathan, R.en
dc.contributor.authorMacIntosh, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCallary, M.en
dc.contributor.authorPenhall, R.en
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, M.en
dc.contributor.authorChapman, I.en
dc.date.issued2003en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003; 51(7):1007-1011en
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/9653-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.comen
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES:To identify predictors and consequences of nutritional risk, as determined by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), in older recipients of domiciliary care services living at home. DESIGN:Baseline analysis of subject characteristics with low MNA scores (<24) and follow-up of the consequences of these low scores. SETTING:South Australia. PARTICIPANTS:Two hundred fifty domiciliary care clients (aged 67-99, 173 women). MEASUREMENTS:Baseline history and nutritional status were determined. Information about hospitalization was obtained at follow-up 12 months later. INTERVENTION:Letters suggesting nutritional intervention were sent to general practitioners of subjects not well nourished. RESULTS:At baseline, 56.8% were well nourished, 38.4% were at risk of malnutrition, and 4.8% were malnourished (43.2% not well nourished). Independent predictors of low MNA scores (<24) were living alone, and the physical and mental component scales of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Follow-up information was obtained for 240 subjects (96%). In the ensuing year not well-nourished subjects were more likely than well-nourished subjects to have been admitted to the hospital (risk ratio (RR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-2.14), have two or more emergency hospital admissions (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.15-7.59), spend more than 4 weeks in the hospital (RR = 3.22, 95% CI = 1.29-8.07), fall (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.13-2.41), and report weight loss (RR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.67-4.15). CONCLUSION:The MNA identified a large number of subjects with impaired nutrition who did significantly worse than well-nourished subjects during the following year. Studies are needed to determine whether nutritional or other interventions in people with low MNA scores can improve clinical outcomes.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRenuka Visvanathan, Caroline Macintosh, Mandy Callary, Robert Penhall, Michael Horowitz, and Ian Chapman,en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Inc.en
dc.subjectHumans; Nutrition Disorders; Hospitalization; Geriatric Assessment; Nutrition Assessment; Risk Factors; Follow-Up Studies; Predictive Value of Tests; Nutritional Status; Time Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Home Care Services; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Australia; Female; Maleen
dc.titleThe nutritional status of 250 older Australian recipients of domiciliary care services and its association with outcomes at 12 monthsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020030094en
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51317.xen
dc.identifier.pubid59084-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidVisvanathan, R. [0000-0002-1303-9479]en
dc.identifier.orcidHorowitz, M. [0000-0002-0942-0306]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.