Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/99933
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBacchi, C.en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationSAGE Open, 2016; 6(2):1-16en
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440en
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/99933-
dc.descriptionPublished 22 June 2016en
dc.description.abstractThis article directs attention to the significance, for health promotion advocates, of reflecting on how “problems” are constituted, or brought into existence, as particular sorts of problems, within policies and policy proposals. To this end, it introduces a poststructural analytic strategy called “What’s the Problem Represented to be?” (WPR approach), and contrasts this perspective to the ways in which “problems” are commonly conceptualized in health policy analyses (e.g., “a problem stream,” “wicked problems”). Such a perspective offers a significant rethinking of the conventional emphasis on agenda setting and policy-making processes in considering the meaning of success or failure in health policy initiatives. The starting point is a close analysis of items that are “successful,” in the sense that they make the political agenda, to see how representations of “problems” within selected policies limit what is talked about as possible or desirable, or as impossible and undesirable. This form of analysis thus enables critical reflections on the substantive content of policy initiatives in health policy. The article takes a step back from policy process theories, frameworks, and models to offer reflections at the level of paradigms. Highlighting potential dangers and limitations in positivism, interpretivism, and critical realism, it uses international, Australian, and South Australian examples in health policy to explore what poststructural policy analysis contributes to understanding the broad political influences shaping contemporary modes of rule.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCarol Bacchien
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en
dc.source.urihttp://sgo.sagepub.com/content/6/2/2158244016653986en
dc.subjectproblematizations; poststructuralism; paradigms; health policy; interpretivism; realist evaluationen
dc.titleProblematizations in health policy: questioning how “problems” are constituted in policiesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030049868en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2158244016653986en
dc.identifier.pubid254503-
pubs.library.collectionPolitics publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS03en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Politics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_99933.pdfPublished version233.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.