Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/134050
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare systems in Africa: a scoping review of preparedness, impact and response
Author: Tessema, G.A.
Kinfu, Y.
Dachew, B.A.
Tesema, A.G.
Assefa, Y.
Alene, K.A.
Aregay, A.F.
Ayalew, M.B.
Bezabhe, W.M.
Bali, A.G.
Dadi, A.F.
Duko, B.
Erku, D.
Gebrekidan, K.
Gebremariam, K.T.
Gebremichael, L.G.
Gebreyohannes, E.A.
Gelaw, Y.A.
Gesesew, H.A.
Kibret, G.D.
et al.
Citation: BMJ Global Health, 2021; 6(12):e007179-1-e007179-14
Publisher: BMJ
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 2059-7908
2059-7908
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Gizachew A Tessema, Yohannes Kinfu, Berihun Assefa Dachew, Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema, Yibeltal Assefa, Kefyalew Addis Alene ... et al.
Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed health systems in both developed and developing nations alike. Africa has one of the weakest health systems globally, but there is limited evidence on how the region is prepared for, impacted by and responded to the pandemic. Methods We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL to search peer-reviewed articles and Google, Google Scholar and preprint sites for grey literature. The scoping review captured studies on either preparedness or impacts or responses associated with COVID-19 or covering one or more of the three topics and guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. The extracted information was documented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension checklist for scoping reviews. Finally, the resulting data were thematically analysed. Results Twenty-two eligible studies, of which 6 reported on health system preparedness, 19 described the impacts of COVID-19 on access to general and essential health services and 7 focused on responses taken by the healthcare systems were included. The main setbacks in health system preparation included lack of available health services needed for the pandemic, inadequate resources and equipment, and limited testing ability and surge capacity for COVID-19. Reduced flow of patients and missing scheduled appointments were among the most common impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health system responses identified in this review included the availability of telephone consultations, re-purposing of available services and establishment of isolation centres, and provisions of COVID-19 guidelines in some settings. Conclusions The health systems in Africa were inadequately prepared for the pandemic, and its impact was substantial. Responses were slow and did not match the magnitude of the problem. Interventions that will improve and strengthen health system resilience and financing through local, national and global engagement should be prioritised.
Keywords: COVID-19; health policy; health services research; health systems
Rights: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercia. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.l re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007179
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1195716
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007179
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_134050.pdfPublished version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.