Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/51494
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHynd, A.-
dc.contributor.authorRoughead, E.-
dc.contributor.authorPreen, D.-
dc.contributor.authorGlover, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBulsara, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSemmens, J.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2009; 33(3):246-252-
dc.identifier.issn1326-0200-
dc.identifier.issn1753-6405-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/51494-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version may be found at www.wiley.com-
dc.description.abstract<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether a 24% increase in patient co-payments in January 2005 and two related co-payment changes for medicines subsidised under the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) were associated with changes in dispensings in Western Australia (WA).<h4>Method</h4>We analysed aggregate monthly prescription counts and defined daily dose per 1,000 population per day (DDD/1,000/day) for atypical antipsychotics, combination asthma medicines, HmgCoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). Trends pre and post the co-payment increase in January 2005 were compared.<h4>Results</h4>In three of the four categories examined, prescription counts were significantly lower following the increase in co-payment thresholds. Compared with dispensings prior to the co-payment increase, prescriptions fell by 8% for combination asthma medicines (p<0.001), 9% for PPIs (p<0.001) and 5% for statins (p<0.001). Following the rise in co-payments, DDD/1,000/day decreased for all four categories. Decreases in dispensings to concessional beneficiaries were between 4% and 5% larger than for general beneficiary patients.<h4>Conclusions and implications</h4>The reduction in the both prescription counts and DDD/1,000/day observed for combination asthma medicines, PPIs and statins, which all remained above co-payment thresholds, suggests the increase in PBS co-payments has affected utilisation of these subsidised medicines. The results indicate that increases in patient contributions particularly impact on concessional patients' ability to afford prescription medicines.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAnna Hynd, Elizabeth E. Roughead, David B. Preen, John Glover, Max Bulsara and James Semmens-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPublic Health Assoc Australia Inc-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00383.x-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectPharmaceutical Preparations-
dc.subjectCost Sharing-
dc.subjectFinancing, Government-
dc.subjectInsurance, Pharmaceutical Services-
dc.subjectNational Health Programs-
dc.subjectWestern Australia-
dc.subjectDatabases as Topic-
dc.titleIncreased patient co-payments and changes in PBS-subsidised prescription medicines dispensed in Western Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00383.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.