Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/56235
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlover, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, S.-
dc.contributor.authorDuckett, S.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2009; 6(1):1-6-
dc.identifier.issn1743-8462-
dc.identifier.issn1743-8462-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/56235-
dc.description.abstractBackground Private health insurance has been a major focus of Commonwealth Government health policy for the last decade. Over this period, the Howard government introduced a number of policy changes which impacted on the take up of private health insurance. The most expensive of these was the introduction of the private health insurance rebate in 1997, which had an estimated cost of $3 billion per annum. Methods This article uses information on the geographic distribution of the population with private health insurance cover to identify associations between rates of private health insurance cover and socioeconomic status. The geographic analysis is repeated with survey data on expenditure on private health insurance, to provide an estimate of the rebate flowing to different socioeconomic groups. Results The analysis highlights the strong association between high rates of private health insurance cover and high socioeconomic status and shows the substantial transfer of funds, under the private health insurance rebate, to those living in areas of highest socioeconomic status, compared with those in areas of lower socioeconomic status, and in particular those in the most disadvantaged areas. The article also provides estimates of private health insurance cover by federal electorate, emphasising the substantial gaps in cover between Liberal Party and Australian Labor Party seats. Conclusion The article concludes by discussing implications of the uneven distribution of private health insurance cover across Australia for policy formation. In particular, the study shows that the prevalence of private health insurance is unevenly distributed across Australia, with marked differences in prevalence in rural and urban areas, and substantial differences by socioeconomic status. Policy formation needs to take this into account. Evaluating the potential impact of changes in private health insurance requires more nuanced consideration than has been implied in the rhetoric about private health insurance over the last decade.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJohn Glover, Sarah Tennant and Stephen Duckett-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-19-
dc.titleThe geographic distribution of private health insurance in Australia in 2001-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1743-8462-6-19-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.