Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/67172
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGregory, T.-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, C.-
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, D.-
dc.contributor.authorCole, S.-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, G.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 2011; 11(1):1-10-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/67172-
dc.descriptionExtent: 10p.-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous research points to differences between predictors of intention to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) and screening behavior, and suggests social ecological factors may influence screening behavior. The aim of this study was to compare the social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention to screen with predictors of participation. Methods: People aged 50 to 74 years recruited from the electoral roll completed a baseline survey (n = 376) and were subsequently invited to complete an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). Results: Multivariate analyses revealed five predictors of intention to screen and two predictors of participation. Perceived barriers to CRC screening and perceived benefits of CRC screening were the only predictor of both outcomes. There was little support for social ecological factors, but measurement problems may have impacted this finding. Conclusions: This study has confirmed that the predictors of intention to screen for CRC and screening behaviour, although overlapping, are not the same. Research should focus predominantly on those factors shown to predict participation. Perceptions about the barriers to screening and benefits of screening are key predictors of participation, and provide a focus for intervention programs.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityTess A Gregory, Carlene Wilson, Amy Duncan, Deborah Turnbull, Stephen R Cole and Graeme Young-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rights© 2011 Gregory et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-38-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms-
dc.subjectSigmoidoscopy-
dc.subjectOccult Blood-
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis-
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice-
dc.subjectHealth Behavior-
dc.subjectHealth Policy-
dc.subjectSocial Environment-
dc.subjectSocial Support-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectPatient Participation-
dc.subjectHealth Services Accessibility-
dc.subjectPatient Acceptance of Health Care-
dc.subjectSouth Australia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Cancer-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titleDemographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-11-38-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/324717-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGregory, T. [0000-0003-4799-6258]-
dc.identifier.orcidWilson, C. [0000-0002-1883-4690]-
dc.identifier.orcidTurnbull, D. [0000-0002-7116-7073]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_67172.pdfPublished version507.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.