Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/68757
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Street, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hennessy, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Watt, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hiller, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Elshaug, A. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011; 27(4):376-383 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0266-4623 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-6348 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/68757 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of this study, in the context of disinvestment related health technology assessment, is to examine whether analysis of Web 2.0—commercial media output, blogs, and discussion forums—can provide an understanding of media framing, community perspectives, and the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology. Methods: Thematic analysis of relevant data from fifty-nine media articles, thirty-nine discussion forums, thirteen blogs, and three Facebook pages relating to our case study: public funding for assisted reproductive technology services. Mainstream media and community-based social media responses were compared. Results: Media responses were narrow, primarily describing emotive individual narratives or the political nexus of interests. Community (including patient) responses were broader including discussion of opportunity cost and vested interests but mostly reflected the polar ends of the debate, diverging strongly for or against disinvestment from public funding. Conclusion: Web2.0 and media analysis offers an inexpensive method to capture media portrayal, divergent community responses both to that portrayal and independent of it, and insight into the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology undergoing disinvestment debate. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Jackie M. Street, Sophie E. Hennessy, Amber M. Watt, Janet E. Hiller and Adam G. Elshaug | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge Univ Press | - |
dc.rights | © Cambridge University Press 2011 | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026646231100033x | - |
dc.subject | Disinvestment | - |
dc.subject | Community perspectives | - |
dc.subject | Assisted reproductive technologies | - |
dc.subject | Social media | - |
dc.subject | Web2.0 | - |
dc.title | News and social media: Windows into community perspectives on disinvestment | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S026646231100033X | - |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/565501 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Street, J. [0000-0002-1033-4341] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Hiller, J. [0000-0002-8532-4033] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Elshaug, A. [0000-0002-4939-5379] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Public Health publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_68757.pdf | Accepted version | 294.99 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.