Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/73095
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGillam, M.-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, P.-
dc.contributor.authorSalter, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGraves, S.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationActa Orthopaedica, 2012; 83(3):220-226-
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674-
dc.identifier.issn1745-3682-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/73095-
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: An increasing number of patients have several joint replacement procedures during their lifetime. We investigated the use and suitability of multi-state model techniques in providing a more comprehensive analysis and description of complex arthroplasty histories held in arthroplasty registries than are allowed for with traditional survival methods. Patients and methods: We obtained data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry on patients (n = 84,759) who had undergone a total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in the period 2002–2008. We set up a multi-state model where patients were followed from their first recorded arthroplasty to several possible states: revision of first arthroplasty, either a hip or knee as second arthroplasty, revision of the second arthroplasty, and death. The Summary Notation for Arthroplasty Histories (SNAH) was developed in order to help to manage and analyze this type of data. Results: At the end of the study period, 12% of the 84,759 patients had received a second hip, 3 times as many as had received a knee. The estimated probabilities of having received a second arthroplasty decreased with age. Males had a lower transition rate for receiving a second arthroplasty, but a higher mortality rate. Interpretation: Multi-state models in combination with SNAH codes are well suited to the management and analysis of arthroplasty registry data on patients who experience multiple joint procedures over time. We found differences in the progression of joint replacement procedures after the initial total hip arthroplasty regarding type of joint, age, and sex.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMarianne H Gillam, Philip Ryan, Amy Salter, Stephen E Graves-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.684140-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis, Knee-
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis, Hip-
dc.subjectArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip-
dc.subjectArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee-
dc.subjectReoperation-
dc.subjectSecond-Look Surgery-
dc.subjectEpidemiologic Methods-
dc.subjectHip Prosthesis-
dc.subjectKnee Prosthesis-
dc.subjectAge Distribution-
dc.subjectSex Distribution-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.titleMulti-state models and arthroplasty histories after unilateral total hip arthroplasties: Introducing the Summary Notation for Arthroplasty Histories-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/17453674.2012.684140-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSalter, A. [0000-0002-2881-0684]-
dc.identifier.orcidGraves, S. [0000-0002-1629-319X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.