Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 2012; 8(2):98-111||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Extensive work has been conducted on constructions of the female body as risky, particularly in relation to reproduction (Martin, 1987; Rich, 1976; Ussher, 2006). In contrast, the male reproductive body generally remains in-visible (Oudshoorn, 2004). The analysis presented in this paper explores debate in 285 online responses to an article about gender-based differential pricing of health insurance. One of the discursive strategies drawn upon to defend this differential pricing is through familiar constructions of women’s bodies as ‘at risk’ due to reproductive potential. However, this justification for inequality is resisted within the corpus through explicitly rendering the male body as similarly ‘at risk’ of reproduction. By examining how both women’s and men’s reproductive bodies are made visible, this paper explores discursive practices around how gender inequality is (re)produced and resisted. In particular, we can see how rendering the male reproductive body visible works in this context to resist practices that disadvantage women relative to men, and expand the responsibility for reproduction beyond women and individual, to society as a whole.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Brianne Hastie, Suzanne Cosh||en|
|dc.publisher||Australian Psychological Society||en|
|dc.rights||© 2012 Australian Psychological Society||en|
|dc.subject||Inequality; risk; discrimination; reproduction; bodies||en|
|dc.title||'Aren't men also involved in childbearing?': rendering the male reproductive body visible to resist gender inequality||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Cosh, S. [0000-0002-8003-3704]||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.